23.5.2 Problems Relating to Appearance
This is what the majority of pediatric facial palsy patients
present with—and specifically an inability to generate a smile
that falls within the range of what the family perceive as “nor-
mal.” Addressing the appearance of facial paralysis may have
not just an aesthetic, but a psychological and social impact too.
Again, as with the functional issues, the goals pertaining to the
management of the appearance of the paralyzed face may be
stratified for convenience in the usual order of importance for
the patients:
1. Alleviation of socially embarrassing sequelae of paralysis—
drooling, an unblinking “staring” eye, or apparently sad face
at rest.
2. Restoration of symmetry at rest.
3. Restoration of dynamic symmetry.
4. Restoration of spontaneous, dynamic symmetry.
Appreciation of the symmetry is vital here—as in unilateral
cases, the a ected side is abnorm al by comparison with the
una ected side. Furthermore, this means that treating the
asymmetry by treating the una ected side as a balancing proce-
dure, for example, with botulinum toxin or myotomy, may be a
reasonable option.
Another consideration is synkinesis (the, unwanted, involun-
tary contraction of a muscle in association with the contraction
of another). It is a problem in facial palsy due to aberrant rein-
nervation, and further negatively impacts on the appearance of
the paralyzed face. Synkinesia is not as great a problem in the
pediatric population as in the adult population, given the
patients being managed in the pediatric facial palsy clinic are
often those with permanent facial palsy following trauma or
developmental dysgenesis (where there may not even be
muscle which can be reinnervated aberrantly or otherwise), in
whom spontaneous re-neurotization is unlikely. Therapeutic
options for synkineses include biofeedback therapy, botulinum
toxin, and cross-face nerve grafting.
23.6 Nonoperative Management
Rehabilitation and therapy services are fundamental compo-
nents of management. However, in children, the situation may
be more problematic. This is for two reasons. First, children
may be more challenging to engage with and a play-based
approach is required. Second, there may be little chance of
recovery (e.g., following tumor resection or a congenital anom-
aly) and so a more limited role for rehabilitation, and more of a
role for the encouragement-adaptive techniques.
Many nonsurgical methods in pediatric facial palsy focus on
the management of the exposed eye. Lubricating eye drops
should be used regularly to prevent drying of the eye, and lower
lid taping and night patching may also be used, although these
are sometimes not well tolerated in children. Another
extremely important issue is the recognition that at its heart,
pediatric facial palsy is primarily a problem of how the child is
seen to be interacting with the social group around them, and
though operative treatments are largely focused on addressing
this issue, there are other methods of helping with this that
involve the input of nonsurgical sta , such as psychologists and
social workers.
23.7 Operative Management
The ideal surgery for a facial nerve injury is a direct repair fol-
lowed by nerve grafting of the defect. In theory, these may
allow recovery of spontaneous, appropriately coordinated facial
movements. However, particularly in pediatric facial palsy, this
is often not possible because of the nature of the pathologies
encountered. Reconstructive surgery is performed in recalci-
trant facial palsy where spontaneous recovery is not expected.
There are numerous procedures that have been described to
manage facial palsy, and they have been previously classified
according to whether they are “dynamic” (improve the active
range of achievable movement) or static (which do not a ect
the active range of movement), and according to the area of the
face that they are used to reconstruct. The dynamic procedures
essentially either require neurotization of defunctioned muscle,
the transfer of a functional muscle, or even the neurotization
of a transferred muscle. On occasion, while a divided facial
nerve or part of the facial nerve is awaiting appropriate neu-
rotization to the distal stump (e.g., from a cross-face nerve
graft), a “babysitter procedure” may be undertaken. In this
procedure, another nerve (such as part of the hypoglossal
either directly or via a nerve graft) can be transferred to that
distal stump to prevent the deterioration of the a ected mus-
culature (i.e., loss of motor end plates) until such time as the
cross-face nerve graft is ready for transfer ( Fig. 23.6). The
“babysitter nerve” can then be detached from the facial nerve
and the cross-facial attached. The various techniques are sum-
marized in Table 23.1.
23.7.1 Brow Procedures
Lack of function of the frontalis renders the brow susceptible to
ptosis, which may be aesthetically problematic or, if it obstructs
the visual fields, functionally problematic too. In the pediatric
population, unlike the adult population, this is not a significant
problem, most likely due to the quality of the juvenile soft tis-
sues. In general terms, the procedures that are considered for
brow ptosis are the brow lift—endoscopic (least obvious scar-
ring but least e ective), bicoronal open, and open direct (most
obvious scarring but most e ective)—and contralateral balanc-
ing procedures, which may be temporary (e.g., with botulinum
toxin) or permanent with a myotomy.
23.7.2 The Upper Eyelid
In facial palsy, the unopposed action of the levator can lead to
lagophthalmos, resulting in corneal exposure, and potentially
injury and scarring. Additionally, the e erent pathway of the
blink reflex may not be functional. It is rarely a significant prob-
lem in the pediatric population. The most common procedure is
countering the levator’s action with a gold weight placed in the
upper lid anterior to the tarsal plate ( Fig. 23.7). Classically a
0.8- to 1.2-g weight can be used. In older, more compliant chil-
dren, an estimate can be made of which weight to use preoper-
atively by taping a trial weight to the upper lid preoperatively.
Though there are many potential problems including its visibil-
ity, extrusion, and incorrect weighting, the relative e cacy,
simplicity, and reversibility of the procedure mean that it is
commonly used. Alterations to the technique include the use of
Facial Paralysis
233
Fig. 23.6 Diagramatic representation of a
“babysitter” procedure in which the main trunk
of the injured right facial nerve (DISTAL to the
site of injury) is turned down and anastamosed
end-to-side to the hypoglossal nerve temporarily
neurotise the injured facial nerve and keep the
motor end plates of the facial muscles intact until
such time as axons from a cross facial nerve graft
can reach the injured nerve. The arrows represent
the direction of growth of the neurones.
Table 23.1 Summary of the various reconstructive procedures that may be used in facial reanimation
Static procedures
Dynamic procedures
Brow
Direct excision brow lift
Open brow lift
Endoscopic brow lift
Contralateral weakening
Upper eye lid
Weights
Palpebral springs
Tarsorrhaphy
Temporalis transfer
Levator botulinum toxin
Direct muscle neurotization
Cross facial transfer
Free muscle transfer
Lower lid
Static sling
Temporalis transfer
Lateral canthoplasty
Direct muscle neurotization
Medical canthoplasty
Cross-facial transfer
Lid shortening
Free muscle transfer
Nasal airway
Cheek lateralization procedures
Tendon sling
Septoplasty
Commissure/upper lip
Static slings
Direct muscle neurotization
Direct muscle
Cross facial transfer
Regional muscle transfer
Free muscle transfer
Soft-Tissue Deformities of the Head and Neck
234
smaller, lower profile platinum plates, and related techniques
such as the use of magnetized and silicone-implantable devices,
although these are less common.
Other static procedures that are more rarely used in the
pediatric population include the use of a palpebral spring sys-
tem ( Fig. 23.8) and tarsorrhaphy. The principle of tarsorrha-
phy is to fuse the upper and lower eyelids by one of several
di erent methods, reducing excursion and narrowing the pal-
pebral aperture. A tarsorrhaphy is relatively simple and may be
permanent, or where recovery or another definitive eyelid pro-
cedure is expected, temporary.
Of the dynamic procedures, a strip of temporalis muscle is
dissected and transposed anteriorly, extended by means of
fascial or tendon grafts, and attached to the upper and lower
eyelids, allowing voluntary (but not reflex) movement, con-
trolled by temporalis contraction ( Fig. 23.9). More recently,
dynamic “spontaneous and symmetrical” procedures have been
developed, such as a free platysma transfer powered by a cross-
facial nerve graft.
The use of botulinum toxin for the levator palpebrae supe-
rioris to counter the e ect of the orbicularis may also be
used as a temporary measure in order to allow corneal
ulcers to heal.
Generally, contralateral balancing procedures are not
appropriate for the upper eyelid as they would risk causing
lid ptosis.
Fig. 23.7 A diagram showing the use of gold
weights for the management of upper lid–related
lagophthalmos. The weight is placed just anterior
to the tarsal plate through an “upper-blephar-
oplasty” type incision.
Fig. 23.8 A schematic demonstrating the spring
technique by Morel-Fatio and Lalardie (1964). The
spring (blue) is placed in the lateral canthal
region. One arm of the spring pushes against the
orbital roof and the other against the lower lid,
enabling it to close.
Facial Paralysis
235
23.7.3 The Lower Eyelid
The lower eyelid is also not commonly a problem in children.
While like the upper eyelid the problem is one impairing
closure of the eyelid, the etiology and e ect of the problem are
somewhat di erent. In the upper eyelid, the problem is one of
unopposed levator action and inadequate motion, but in the
lower eyelid, the “antagonist” is gravity and the problem is of
inadequate support. It may be that the relative resilience of the
pediatric population to lower lid problems is associated with
their greater soft-tissue elasticity. The problem with lower lid
paralysis is the potential for ectropion. The result is that due to
the increased exposure of the eye, there is a feeling of dryness
and also a paradoxical simultaneous epiphora, resulting from
the loss of opposition of the lower lid lacrimal punctum to the
globe of the eye.
In the event of lower lid ectropion, many of the dynamic pro-
cedures that can be used are similar to those for the upper lid—
the temporalis transfer, cross-face neurotization procedures,
and free tissue transfer. In our experience, though, static proce-
dures—which essentially act to lend support to the drooping
lower lid—are usually adequate. A tendon graft may be passed
through the lower lid between the canthi and tightened to
form a static sling helping appose the lower lid to the globe
( Fig. 23.10). Medial and lateral canthoplasties may also be
performed. In the event of the primary problem being an exces-
sively everted lacrimal punctum within the lower lid, a tarso-
conjunctival ellipse may be excised from the medial lower lid to
reposition the medial canthus. If the problem is primarily lat-
eral, a lateral canthoplasty by a canthopexy or tarsal strip pro-
cedure may be performed, in which the lateral canthus is
resuspended from the orbital rim.
23.7.4 The Nasal Airway
As a result of loss of ipsilateral soft-tissue support of the nose,
the nasal airway may be prone to collapse. In unilateral cases,
there is enough redundancy that the contralateral nasal airway
is adequate to allow comfortable respiration, though if severe
Fig. 23.9 Diagram adapted from Kazenstein describing the use of the
temporalis transfer technique (1916). A segment of the temporalis
muscle is turned down, split, and transferred to the eyelids and oral
commissure.
Fig. 23.10 (a) Incisions are located at A, B, and C. (b) The sling is positioned over the tarsal plate with a lacrimal probe in place to prevent damage to
canaliculus. (c) A strip of tendon is passed through the eye of a Keith needle. (Adapted from Carraway and Manktelow 1999.)
Soft-Tissue Deformities of the Head and Neck
236
and bilateral it may be addressed with suspension procedures.
Occasionally, if associated with septal deviation, it may benefit
from septoplasty. However, in general, problems around nasal
collapse are often addressed by secondary benefit of procedures
that act to suspend the upper lip and oral commissure and so
indirectly act on the nasal airway.
23.7.5 The Upper Lip and Oral
Commissure
Within the pediatric population, the loss of midface symmetry
and the “smile” is the most common reason for presentation,
and the most common indication for surgical intervention. It is
primarily as a result of the loss of function of the lateral and
superior pull of the zygomaticus major and minor (“the Mona
Lisa smile”), and levator labii superioris (“the canine smile;”