[9] Noble J, Munro CA, Prasad VS, Midha R. Analysis of upper and
lower extremity peripheral nerve injuries in a population of
patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 1998; 45(1):116–
122
[10] Lieberman AR. The axon reaction: a review of the principal
features of perikaryal responses to axon injury. Int Rev
Neurobiol. 1971; 14:49–124
[11] Dubuisson AS, Kline DG. Brachial plexus injury: a survey of
100 consecutive cases from a single service. Neurosurgery.
2002; 51(3):673–682, discussion 682–683
[12] Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel RL, Kline DG. Infraclavicular brachial
plexus stretch injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(5):E4
[13] Seddon HJ. Nerves Injuries Committee of the British Medical
Research Council. In: Seddon HJ, ed. Peripheral nerve
injuries. London: Her Majesty's Stationery O ce, 1954. MRC
Special Report Series, no. 282:10–11
[14] Gilbert A, Tassin JL. Réparation chirurgicale du plexus
brachial dans la paralysie obstétricale. Chirurgie. 1984; 110
(1):70–75
[15] Blaauw G, Muhlig RS, Vredeveld JW. Management of brachial
plexus injuries. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 2008; 33:201–
231
[16] Birchansky S, Altman N. Imaging the brachial plexus and
peripheral nerves in infants and children. Semin Pediatr
Neurol. 2000; 7(1):15–25
[17] Gilbert A, Pivato G, Kheiralla T. Long-term results of primary
repair of brachial plexus lesions in children. Microsurgery.
2006; 26(4):334–342
[18] Dodds SD, Wolfe SW. Perinatal brachial plexus palsy. Curr
Opin Pediatr. 2000; 12(1):40–47
[19] Varitimidis SE, Sotereanos DG. Partial nerve injuries in the
upper extremity. Hand Clin. 2000; 16(1):141–149
[20] Kaufman Y, Cole P, Hollier L. Peripheral nerve injuries of the
pediatric hand: issues in diagnosis and management. J
Craniofac Surg. 2009; 20(4):1011–1015, 1011–1015
[21] Wolford LM, Stevao EL. Considerations in nerve repair. Proc
Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2003; 16(2):152–156
[22] Dubuisson A, Kline DG. Indications for peripheral nerve and
brachial plexus surgery. Neurol Clin. 1992; 10(4):935–951
[23] Spinner RJ, Kline DG. Surgery for peripheral nerve and
brachial plexus injuries or other nerve lesions. Muscle Nerve.
2000; 23(5):680–695
[24] Murovic JA. Lower-extremity peripheral nerve injuries: a
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center literature
review with comparison of the operative outcomes of 806
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center sciatic,
common peroneal, and tibial nerve lesions. Neurosurgery.
2009; 65 suppl 4:A18–A23
[25] Murovic JA. Upper-extremity peripheral nerve injuries: a
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center literature
review with comparison of the operative outcomes of 1837
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center median,
radial, and ulnar nerve lesions. Neurosurgery. 2009; 65 suppl
4:A11–A17
[26] Witzel C, Rohde C, Brushart TM. Pathway sampling by
regenerating peripheral axons. J Comp Neurol. 2005; 485(3):
183–190
[27] Tiel RL, Happel LT, Jr, Kline DG. Nerve action potential
recording method and equipment. Neurosurgery. 1996; 39
(1):103–108, discussion 108–109
[28] Roganovic´ Z, Pavlicevic´ G. Di erence in recovery potential
of peripheral nerves after graft repairs. Neurosurgery. 2006;
59(3):621–633, discussion 621–633
[29] Nichols CM, Brenner MJ, Fox IK, et al. E ects of motor versus
sensory nerve grafts on peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp
Neurol. 2004; 190(2):347–355
[30] Siemionow M, Uygur S, Ozturk C, Siemionow K. Techniques
and materials for enhancement of peripheral nerve
regeneration: a literature review. Microsurgery. 2013; 33(4):
318–328
[31] Matz SO, Welliver PS, Welliver DI. Brachial plexus
neuropraxia complicating a comminuted clavicle fracture in
a college football player. Case report and review of the
literature. Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17(4):581–583
[32] El-Gammal TA, El-Sayed A, Kotb MM, El Gammal. Surgical
treatment of brachial plexus traction injuries in children,
excluding obstetric palsy. Microsurgery. 2003; 23(1):14–17
[33] Midha R. Epidemiology of brachial plexus injuries in a
multitrauma population. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40(6):1182–
1188, discussion 1188–1189
[34] Michelow BJ, Clarke HM, Curtis CG, Zuker RM, Seifu Y,
Andrews DF. The natural history of obstetrical brachial
plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 93(4):675–680,
discussion 681
[35] Clarke HM, Curtis CG. An approach to obstetrical brachial
plexus injuries. Hand Clin. 1995; 11(4):563–580, discussion
580–581
[36] Narakas AO, Hentz VR. Neurotization in brachial plexus
injuries. Indication and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988
(237):43–56
[37] Samardzić M, Rasulić L, Grujicić D, Milicić B. Results of nerve
transfers to the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves.
Neurosurgery. 2000; 46(1):93–101, discussion 101–103
[38] Oberlin C, Teboul F, Severin S, Beaulieu JY. Transfer of the
lateral cutaneous nerve of the forearm to the dorsal branch
of the ulnar nerve, for providing sensation on the ulnar
aspect of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112(5):1498–
1500
[39] Liu Y, Lao J, Gao K, Gu Y, Zhao X. Functional outcome of nerve
transfers for traumatic global brachial plexus avulsion.
Injury. 2013; 44(5):655–660
[40] Midha R. Nerve transfers for severe brachial plexus injuries: a
review. Neurosurg Focus. 2004; 16(5):E5
[41] Omer GE, Jr. Injuries to nerves of the upper extremity. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 1974; 56(8):1615–1624
[42] Niver GE, Ilyas AM. Management of radial nerve palsy
following fractures of the humerus. Orthop Clin North Am.
2013; 44(3):419–424, x
[43] Rorabeck CH, Clarke KM. The pathophysiology of the anterior
tibial compartment
syndrome:
an
experimental
investigation. J Trauma. 1978; 18(5):299–304
[44] Dormans JP, Squillante R, Sharf H. Acute neurovascular
complications with supracondylar humerus fractures in
children. J Hand Surg Am. 1995; 20(1):1–4
[45] Amillo S, Mora G. Surgical management of neural injuries
associated with elbow fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop.
1999; 19(5):573–577
[46] de Laat EA, Visser CP, Coene LN, Pahlplatz PV, Tavy DL. Nerve
lesions in primary shoulder dislocations and humeral neck
fractures. A prospective clinical and EMG study. J Bone Joint
Surg Br. 1994; 76(3):381–383
[47] Pollock FH, Drake D, Bovill EG, Day L, Trafton PG. Treatment
of radial neuropathy associated with fractures of the
humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981; 63(2):239–243
[48] Mohler LR, Hanel DP. Closed fractures complicated by
peripheral nerve injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006; 14(1):
32–37
[49] Roganović Z. Factors influencing the outcome of nerve repair.
Vojnosanit Pregl. 1998; 55(2):119–131
[50] Böstman O, Bakalim G, Vainionpää S, Wilppula E, Pätiälä H,
Rokkanen P. Radial palsy in shaft fracture of the humerus.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1986; 57(4):316–319
Pediatric Peripheral Nervous System Trauma
407
[51] Ring D, Chin K, Jupiter JB. Radial nerve palsy associated with
high-energy humeral shaft fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2004;
29(1):144–147
[52] Mehlman CT, Strub WM, Roy DR, Wall EJ, Crawford AH. The
e ect of surgical timing on the perioperative complications
of treatm ent of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A(3):323–327
[53] Kim DH, Murovic JA, Tiel R, Kline DG. Management and
outcomes in 353 surgically treated sciatic nerve lesions. J
Neurosurg. 2004; 101(1):8–17
[54] Patterson FP, Morton KS. Neurologic complications of
fractures and dislocations of the pelvis. Surg Gynecol Obstet.
1961; 112:702–706
[55] Kim DH, Kline DG. Surgical outcome for intra- and extrapelvic
femoral nerve lesions. J Neurosurg. 1995; 83(5):783–790
[56] Johnson EW, Jr, Vittands IJ. Nerve injuries in fractures of the
lower extremity. Minn Med. 1969; 52(4):627–633
[57] Morton KS. Traumatic dislocation of the hip: a follow up
study. Can J Surg. 1959; 3:67–74
[58] Roganovic´ Z. Missile-caused complete lesions of the
peroneal nerve and peroneal division of the sciatic nerve:
results of 157 repairs. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57(6):1201–1212,
discussion 1201–1212
[59] Gurdjian ES, Smathers HM. Peripheral nerve injury in
fractures and dislocations of long bones. J Neurosurg. 1945;
2:202–219
Trauma
408
51 Management of Pediatric Head Trauma
Linda W. Xu, Gerald A. Grant
51.1 Introduction
Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) in children lead to
nearly 500,000 emergency room visits a year and
over 2,000 deaths a year. The most common cause
of injury in children of age 0 to 14 years are falls,
followed by being struck by an object, motor
vehicle accident, and assault. Trends for emer-
gency department visits, hospitalizations, deaths,
and mechanism are broken down by age and sum-
marized in Table 51.1. While falls are the most
common cause of TBI in children age 0 to 14 years,
children age 15 to 19 years are more commonly
injured from motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Since
MVCs are more likely to be fatal than other mecha-
nisms, rates of fatal TBI are also highest in the 15-
to 19-year age group. Patients age 0 to 14 years old
have a 2 to 5% rate of death, but children age 15 to
19 years old have a 19% rate of death from TBI.1
Physical mechanisms of injury in traumatic
brain injuries involve acceleration, deceleration,
and rotational forces causing skull fractures, vascu-
lar injuries, direct impact to brain parenchyma,
and axonal shear injury. Levels of injury in TBI can
be loosely categorized into mild (Glasgow Coma
Score ([GCS] 13–15), moderate (GCS 9–12), and
severe (GCS≤8) based on GCS postresuscitation.
Mild TBI is vastly more common than severe and
often underreported as not all children with mild
TBI are brought to medical attention.
51.2 Initial Emergency Room
Evaluation
51.2.1 History
● Determine mechanism.
● Assess for seizures and loss-of-consciousness
events.
● Current headache, stable, increasing or
decreasing.
● Nausea or vomiting.
● Any history of bleeding disorders.
51.2.2 Physical
● Presence of scalp hematoma.
● Lacerations and abrasions on the scalp, assess
whether full thickness.
Table 51.1 Summary of number of emergency department visits, hospitalizations, deaths, and mechanisms of injury for
head trauma per year by age1
Age
ED visits
Hospitalizations
Deaths
Mechanism
0–4
251,546
15,239
998
5.1% MVC
64.2% Falls
0.1% Assault
21.4% Struck by object
9.1% Other
5–9
105,015
8,799
450
7.0% MVC
40.3% Falls
1.0% Assault
33.9% Struck by object
17.8% Other
10–14
117,387
11,098
726
5.6% MVC
36.5% Falls
9.7% Assault
29.5% Struck by object
18.8% Other
15–19
157,198
24,896
3,995
25.7% MVC
20.8% Falls
14.2% Assault
23.2% Struck by object
16.0% Other
Abbreviation: MVC, motor vehicle collision.
409
● Palpation for skull fractures.
● If fontanelle present, assess for bulging or
firmness.
● Focal neurological symptoms.
● Evidence of basilar skull fractures (ecchymosis
around eyes or ears, fluid drainage from the
nares or ears).
51.2.3 Neuroimaging
● When to image?
– Focal neurological findings.
– Concern for skull fracture on examination.
– Altered mental status.
– Irritability.
– Bulging fontanelle.
– Persistent vomiting.
– Seizure.
– Prolonged loss of consciousness.
– Concern for child abuse.2,3,4
● For patients with GCS 14 to 15 with mild head
trauma, chance of clinically significant finding
on computed tomography (CT) is 1%.2,5
– Can consider observation without CTscan if
very low risk.
– In low-risk patients with normal mental
status, no hematoma, no loss of consciousness,
no skull fracture, and low-risk mechanism.
○ <0.2% of patients <2 years old have clinically
significant findings on CT.
○ <0.05% of patients >2 years old have
clinically significant findings on CT.5
51.3 Management of Mild TBI
Minor head traum a can be defined as an injury to
the head in a patient that is awake, alert, and
remains responsive throughout the event. In a m ild
TBI, the patient may be currently awake, alert, and
responsive but have had a transient loss of con-
sciousness (LOC), disorientation, or emesis and GCS
14 to 15 on presentation. In this population, 0.1 to
1% will require neurosurgical intervention.3,5,6
Roughly 5% of patients with mild TBI will have
CT findings of either skull fracture or intracranial
abnormality and can be classified as a com pli-
cated m ild TBI.5,6,7 Although this is a small popu-
lation, there is some debate as to whether these
patients have an eventually di erent functional
outcome. Some adult studies show that those with
complicated mild TBI have outcomes more similar
to those with moderate head injuries (GCS 9–12)
with deficits on neuropsychiatric testing and lower
GCS scores while other studies suggest that while
there may be early di erences (prolonged return
to work), there are eventually no functional di er-
ences for those with complicated injuries than
those with uncomplicated TBI.7
As 99% of patients with mild TBI do not require
neurosurgical intervention, it is up for debate
which of these patients should be admitted for
monitoring in the hospital. In general, if there is
any suspicion of injury that may lead to further
decline, other medical issues that may make the
patient unstable, or concern about supervision or
mechanism of injury, patients should be admitted
for observation. In general, patients who have mild
TBI with no findings on initial CT have a low rate
of delayed decline.8,9 General criteria for admission
for mild TBI may thus include the following:
● Intracranial injury on CT
● Depressed skull fracture
● Persistent vomiting
● Any concern for nonaccidental trauma
Concussion is a subset of mild TBI specifically
defined as a low-velocity injury associated with a
rapid onset of short-lived impairment in neurolog-
ical function that resolves spontaneously. These
symptoms are thought to be related to a functional
disturbance rather than a structural disturbance.
Common symptoms are as follows:
● Headache.
● Disorientation.
● Loss of consciousness.
● Amnesia.
● Irritability.
● Insomnia.
● Emotional lability.
Initial on-site evaluation for concussion should
proceed as standard emergency care with evalua-
tion of ABCs and precautions for any associated
cervical spine injury. The patient needs to be
evaluated by a medical provider and if one is not
available on site, they should be taken for urgent
referral. The patient should not be left unattended
for the first hours after injury in case of neurologi-
cal decline. If the concussion occurred in the set-
ting of an athletic activity, the patient should not
be allowed to return to play on the day of injury.
Same day return to play can be associated with
delayed onset of symptoms and higher rates of
neuropsychological symptoms postinjury.10
There are several ways to grade concussions and
recommendations for return to play, which are
based on adult guidelines as summarized in
Trauma
410